China's military parade will carry many messages

SCMP EDITORIAL 

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 31 January, 2015, 6:58am

UPDATED : Saturday, 31 January, 2015, 6:58am

• 

China's military parade will carry many messages

Upholding peace is the common thread(線） of events around the world this year marking the 70th anniversary of the end of the second world war. For China, though, there is added historical, political and practical significance. The announcement that a grand military parade will be held in Beijing will give President Xi Jinping a chance to affirm his leadership while showing off the nation's power. But it is not all about flexing muscle(show its power) ; it is also about sacrifice, remembrance(something such as event to keep in mind) and ensuring the past is not forgotten.

Military parades are commonplace(common in many place) around the world; they serve(function) a variety of purposes, from assuring citizens that they are being protected to intimidating enemies. For a decade after the founding of the People's Republic of China, they were a feature of national day celebrations, but the high cost involved led to them being phased out. Deng Xiaoping revived them in the 1980s and they have been held only every 10 years to mark the nation's next decade, the last time for the 60th anniversary in 2009. The pattern will be broken when Xi and invited heads of state, Russian President Vladimir Putin among them, gather in September to review troops, equipment and hardware.

A date has yet to be announced, but it is likely to be September 3, the day Japan surrendered. The parade is in keeping with Xi's patriotism push, two new dates having already been added to the annual commemorative calendar to remember the fighting and suffering under 14 years of brutal Japanese invasion and occupation. Authorities have been at pains to stress that the intention is to add to the global message of peace being sent by the various worldwide anniversary events, not to heighten tensions with Japan and its ally, the US. They are right; Beijing has repeatedly told the world that China's rise will be peaceful and that its military modernisation is aimed purely at defending Chinese interests.

Chinese worry about the nationalist policies of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and China's double-digit defence budget increases are viewed suspiciously by neighbours and the US. A Chinese show of military might on the anniversary of the surrender could certainly be viewed from a geopolitical standpoint. For Xi, though, there is an opportunity to show the control he exerts over the People's Liberation Army, which has become a target of his fight against corruption. Given that the announcement has caused concerns in Japan and elsewhere, China could have eased them by releasing more detail.

consonant clusters

Cosonant clusters are a group of consonant in one syllabe, which will hinder the listener to distinguish the meaning of words.

the following it the link to practise consonant clusters.
http://usefulenglish.ru/phonetics/practice-consonant-clusters

The dust Storm 2014 LPATE oral passage

Dave rolled onto his back, sneezing. Wiping(/waɪp/ 擦) the grit (/ɡrɪt/  砂) from his eyes, he looked around. The storm had passed and the dust was falling. How long had he been lying there?

"Man, you look terrible!" Ben was already on his feet.

"No worse than you do," Dave retorted ( /rɪˈtɔːt/ 反駁). "Thanks for shoving (/ʃʌv/ 推) me into this hole. You probably saved my life."

"Anytime, pal."

The boys grinned /ɡrɪn/ , but they both knew how lucky they were. A dust storm could drown/draʊn/   a herd of cattle /ˈkæt.l̩/ . Dusters were more deadly than snow blizzards/ˈblɪz.əd/ - and less predictable. They could strike anytime. Western Nebraska had had very little rain for several years. The prairie(/ˈpreə.ri/ 大草原)   grass wilted ( /wɪlt/凋謝 ) and the corn(/kɔːn/)  shrivelled(/ˈʃrɪv.əl/枯萎) under the cruel sun.

LPAT 2008 writing task 1

philanthropist /fɪˈlæn.θrə.pɪst/ 
a person who helps the poor, especially by giving them money:

Question: Write a short speech for your school graduation ceremony in which you talk about the importance of contributing to the community. Describe someone who devotes some of his/her time and energy to hepling others.

Outline
1. Importance
   a.  have addressed the deepest inequities
   b.  Building a better communties
   c. The government take a long time to do so.

2. The former pricinpal
   a.  donate all of his saving for our school
   b.  providing free lessons for the poor students in his spare time
   c.  visit street sleepers regularly

Principal, fellow teachers and students:

Right here most of our students will graduate from our school after August. You are not the little students who need a lot of guidance but you will be the pillars of our society. I am glad to share with you a topic "sacrificing yourselves to community". Contributing to society takes many forms such as donating money for non-profit making organization, using the spare time to do some volunteer works, setting up a fund to organize some activities and so on. However,  why does it matter to our society?

Devoting ourselves to society can alleviate the deepest inequities of our society. Nowadays, the disparity between the poor and rich is so wide. Some rich families can bear the burden of the unaffordable-priced school fee of international schools, which accounts for over $40 000 a year. At the same time,  the counterparts of the poor are concerned about their daily meals, a large part of their spending a month. The gap in Hong Kong become larger and larger and thus is so wick that the poor will be trapped and cannot move to a upper social ladder. Under the high living standard in Hong Kong, to earn the basic living has already consumed all the time of the poor. Some parents of the poor spends over a half day for working. The jobs of them most likely are cleaning workers, security workers, odd jobs and so on. They not only provide affluent environment for but also accompany with their sons and daughters under the long working hour. It is much more difficult for the poor generation to get a higher social ladder under this disadvantage compared with their counterparts in rich families. The poor still are the poor if we do nothing for them. That's why we should act now for those poor families and their next generation.

Actions speak louder than words. I don't want to share with you a theory of contributing but also today I want to introduce an energetic contributor for you to follow. What has he done? how has he done?  Who is he? He is our former principel. I think all of you haven't known the story of him.

Our former principel,who is one of the founder of our school, spend all his saving for our school. After his retirement,    He still comtribute himself to education. Everyday, after school, he comes to our school to give addtional lessons for our students. One day I found that he stayed the classroom with students until 7:00 p.m. I was so surprised that over 30 students still listen to the lectures of him.  Students really enjoy the well-prepared lessons of him. Those students taught by him got improved greatly and fastly. His after school lessons have been coutinuing since three years ago. The attractiveness of his lesson not only provide suitable ingredients for students to grow but also build up their confidence in public exam.

Other than fostering our students, our former principal visits many street sleepers every Saturday and Sunday. Once he invited me to join his visiting and I immediately agreed to go with him. I think all of you haven't imagined how many street sleepers stayed under the roof of Culture Meseum. Some of them even had't dinners as they had no money   for dinner. Principel and I took 4 big plastic bags full of lunch boxes for those without having their dinners.

LPAT 2010 writing 2A

Write a letter to the Editor responding to the letter above. In your letter, give your opinion on whether Parkour should be promoted to help Hong Kong people become fitter. You should also give two other suggestions, with justifications, of suitable activities to improve the (physical) fitness of Hong Kong people.


Outline
Not promote Parkour
-- itself Dangerous (many accidents)
-- Too crowded for the general public in Hong Kong
-- the general public may not understand the danger of Parkour

Hiking and running,
-- suitable for all ages,
-- suitable in many place,
-- based on its own pace,
-- aerobic exercise,
-- a large competition in Hong Kong.





Dear Editor,
I am writing to respond to the letter from Martin Wat, the chairman and Founder, HK love for Parkour Association. Absolutely, Pakour is an challenging sport for those lovers of Pakour to keep their bodies fitted. However, it is questionable for the general public to follow the suit of those lovers.

The suitabilities of Parkour could be assessed on the safety of the sport, the limitation in the Hong Kong environment, and the popularity in Hong Kong.

It is undeniable that Pakour is a danger sport for the general public. The practitioners have to jump over and around obstacles, such as benches, even the gap between buildings. If sportmen concentrate on every single movement, they can overcome any obstacles they face. However, even professional practitioneres get hurted as they loss concentration suddenly or other uncontrolable factors exist such as moving humans or animal, damaged benches or others. the conseuqences of Pakour accidents can damage the human body eternally, irrecoverably and serviously. .

Other than the danger of Pakour, the design of the Hong Kong city and the density of population would serviously hinder the development of this sport for the general public.To promote this sport for the general public, enough space for practising Pakour should be found out or developed but is a scare resource in Hong Kong.  Some professional practitioners will just jump over the building of several floors, wherseas most of the building in Hong Kong  are skyscrapers, which are designed for commercial and recreational use but not for jumping over. someone will ague that the sportmen can practise the jumping in predestrian areas. However, every day most of citizens do shopping in those areas , which are no longer reserved for the sport. lack of space must limit the sport for only professional practitioners instead of the general public.




Sincerely,
Peter Choi

Mention of HK independence has heightened tension

【明報專訊】IT HAD BEEN widely hoped that, in Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's third policy address scheduled for publication in the wake of the Occupy movement, there would be sensible policies intended to resolve the political disagreements and lift Hong Kong out of its political impasse. However, yesterday's policy address has failed to lower political temperature. It has, instead, aroused more controversy by touching on the official magazine of the Hong Kong University Students' Union (HKUSU), one issue of which suggested that Hong Kong should find a way to "self-reliance and self-determination" and featured articles exploring the topic of Hong Kong independence.

In the Occupy movement, the central issue was the election of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage. Large numbers of young people participated in the protests, which were largely led by students. In terms of methods and strategies, they are very different from the older generation, who have also been fighting for democracy for more than 30 years. Leung failed to show that he had kept up with the times when commenting on these new circumstances through his policy address. For one thing, the policy address reiterates that the arrangements for the election of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage must be handled in accordance with the decisions and interpretations made by the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC). But the pan-democrats, who wield veto power in the Legislative Council, have declared many times that they will veto any constitutional reform proposal based on the August 31 resolution. The message of the policy address is that unless things take a dramatic turn, the constitutional reform proposal will be vetoed by the Legislative Council, and our political system will in all probability remain as it is.

The policy address mentions only briefly the relationship between young people and the Occupy movement, saying, "We fully recognise the aspirations of our young students for democracy and their concerns about political reforms." It fails to show proper regard for the new circumstances surrounding young people's fight for democracy and universal suffrage. It, instead, singles out the HKUSU's official magazine, one issue of which featured a cover story entitled "Hong Kong people deciding their own fate" and advocated that "Hong Kong should find a way to self-reliance and self-determination". The policy address claims that the magazine (which is named Undergrad) and other students, including student leaders of the Occupy movement, "have misstated some facts" and that "we must stay alert". The Occupy movement ended just recently, so it has surprised many people that Leung should touch on the sensitive issue of "Hong Kong independence" in his policy address.

Over the past two years, amid the controversy over constitutional reform, China's official news agencies, former officials of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, and mainland experts and scholars have often in their media coverage or analyses sought to link the Occupy movement and some social phenomena with "separation", "division" and even attempts to gain independence. Indeed, the Undergrad essays that Leung commented on yesterday had been mentioned by Hong Kong's pro-Beijing newspapers before. But the SAR government in the past never referred to terms like "separation" or "Hong Kong independence" when commenting on constitutional reform or the Occupy movement. Leung's break with this tradition may be interpreted as an attempt to clarify the constitutional relationship between China and Hong Kong "so that the discussion on constitutional development would not be fruitless". True, in the discussion about constitutional reform, there have been views that show a disregard for the related regulations in the Basic Law or the decisions (or interpretations) made by the NPCSC, one example being the demand for popular nomination. However, what Leung said has the effect of accusing the HKUSU's official magazine and other students of inclining towards or promoting Hong Kong independence. His comments have complicated matters.

明報社評2015.01.15﹕佔領後未見緩解方針 港獨議題對峙更繃緊

特首梁振英第三份《施政報告》，在「後佔領」時期頒布，許多人都期望會有善法良方，尋求破解政治爭議與管治困局。不過，昨日的施政報告並未為政治熱度降溫，反而就港大學生會刊物提出主張香港「自立自決」和討論港獨的文章引發議論。

佔領運動核心議題是特首普選，而運動有大量年輕人參與，學生基本上主導了運動，他們的做法和手段與過去30多年爭取民主的一代十分不同。梁振英透過施政報告回應新形勢，未見有隨時勢不同而調整。首先，施政報告重申2017年特首普選安排，須按全國人大常委會的決定和相關解釋處理，而在立法會擁有否決權的泛民議員，一再聲稱政改方案若按8．31決定的框架設計，他們將會否決。因此，施政報告釋出的信息，實際上就是除非未來有戲劇性變化，否則政改方案將在立法會被否決，政制原地踏步的可能性很大。

施政報告就青年人與佔領運動的關係，僅以「青年學生嚮往民主，關心政制發展，值得肯定」，輕輕帶過。施政報告未正視青年人爭取民主普選的新形勢，卻提出港大學生會官方刊物有關「香港民族 命運自決」、「主張香港『尋找一條自立自決的出路』」等論調，又說「對《學苑》和其他學生，包括佔中的學生領袖的錯誤主張，我們不能不警惕」，云云。佔領運動結束不久，梁振英在施政報告碰觸「港獨」這個敏感議題，出乎很多人意料。

過去兩年圍繞政改的爭議，內地官方媒體、前度港澳辦官員、專家學者等，在報道或討論佔領和一些現象，許多時候的描述都聯繫到分離、分裂甚至走向港獨等；梁振英提及的學苑文章，本港親北京報章也曾提及。儘管如此，特區政府一貫談及政改和佔領諸般事態，並無觸及什麼分裂、港獨情事。梁振英在施政報告提出此事，或許目的在講清楚國家與香港之間的憲制關係，「使政制發展的討論，不致緣木求魚」。在政改討論中，確有不理會《基本法》相關規定與全國人大常委會的決定和解釋的情况，例如要求公民提名，就是一例。不過，梁振英此語一出，客觀效果是指港大學生會的刊物和其他學生涉及趨向港獨甚或鼓吹港獨。事態就顯得十分嚴重了。

■Glossary

impasse﹕a situation in which it is impossible to continue with a discussion or plan because the people involved cannot agree

keep up with the times﹕to change when other things in society, business etc change

Rule of law emerges unharmed from a challenge year

2015年1月14日

【明報專訊】THE YEAR JUST PAST saw the rule of law - the cornerstone of Hong Kong's stability and prosperity - caught up in the tumultuous political strife of the Occupy movement. What happened during the movement shows all the more clearly how important it is to maintain the rule of law and judicial independence.
cornerstone:    /ˈkɔː.nə.stəʊn/
 tumultuous  /tjuːˈmʌl.tjʊəs/:very loud, or full of confusion, change or uncertainty



strife             /straɪf/  violent or angry disagreement


At the opening of the new legal year yesterday, Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung, and Bar Association chairman Paul Shieh Wing-tai all talked about the Occupy movement and its impact on the rule of law. As Chief Justice, Ma passed no judgment on the legality of the movement. He referred to the various injunction proceedings, stressing that the court made its decisions strictly according to the law, and the detailed, reasoned judgments were open to public scrutiny. He said the rule of law has once again proved to be central to the well-being of our society.
Geoffrey(jack free)


Yuen said the rule of law is the bedrock of democracy and universal suffrage, and constitutional reform or universal suffrage without the rule of law is like a house without foundations. Speaking of those who suggest that there are different levels to the concept of the rule of law, and that obeying the law is the lowest level, Yuen said the law remains the law, and is there to be obeyed. If one does not even respect the fundamental requirement of the rule of law, how can one escalate oneself to the higher levels? 

bedrock:/ˈbed.rɒk/ the main principles on which something is based
           

Shieh's interpretation of the rule of law is different from Yuen's. He said the rule of law does not mean blind adherence to laws, but should mean respect for an independent judiciary, the need to ensure the existence of laws that protect human rights, and respect for the rights and liberty of the individual when law enforcers exercise their discretionary powers. He also said the indiscriminate use of the phrase "rule of law" could confer undeserved moral respectability on a "rule by law" or "rule by man" regime.

blind /blaɪnd/
judiciary/dʒuːˈdɪʃ.ər.i/
liberty/ˈlɪb.ə.ti/
confer/kənˈfɜːr/ to exchange ideas on a particular subject, often in order to reach a decision on what action to take


While Ma did not criticise the Occupy movement, he was evidently not happy that the court's injunctions were challenged. "The recent injunctions granted by the court," he said mildly but resoundingly, "were expected by the community to be complied with."
resoundingly/rɪˈzaʊn.dɪŋ/ : loud


Shieh's official position was such that he could speak more openly about the Occupy movement - and his comments were very pointed. Referring to those who in word or in deed overstepped legitimate limits during the Occupy movement, he said, "Regrettably, many influential figures have distorted or even denied such limits." He especially criticised those who claim that disobeying civil court injunctions will not adversely affect the rule of law, and that the rule of law is a concept which only constrains the government, and can never be harmed by citizens' conduct. Shieh's comments are fair and reflect the general opinion of society.
A pointed remark, question, or manner is intended as a criticism of the person it is directed to:
in deed an intentional act

Those in the legal profession who took part in the Occupy movement deliberately distorted the real meaning of the rule of law for political reasons. This was one of the regrettable aspects of the Occupy movement.

明報社評2015.01.13﹕法治歷經不尋常一年 基石受衝擊屹立不倒

剛過去的一年，本港穩定繁榮的基石——法治，因為佔領行動而陷入政治鬥爭漩渦。佔領行動一役，更突顯維護法治與司法獨立的重要。

昨日新法律年度開啟典禮，終審法院首席法官馬道立、律政司長袁國強與大律師公會主席石永泰分別致辭，其中內容都談到佔領行動與法治的關係。馬道立身為大法官，就佔領行動違法與否，並未定性；他強調法院在涉及佔領的幾宗禁制令訴訟，都是依據法律和程序進行，法官嚴格遵照法律斷案，詳列理由的判決書公開讓公衆查閱。他也認為，這是再次體現法治在香港社會的核心地位。

袁國強說法治是民主與普選的基石，認為沒有法治，政改或普選將猶如欠缺地基的樓房。他指出有人提到法治概念分不同層次，守法只是最低層次，但是袁國強批評這個說法，認為法律始終是法律，理應遵守；若法治概念中最基本的守法要求也不尊重，談何踏上法治的更高階梯？

石永泰解讀法治，與袁國強不同。石永泰認為法治不僅僅是盲目地「守法」，而是包括尊重獨立的司法機構，法律條文也必須對人權有所保障，執法者在行使法律賦予的酌情權時必須尊重個人的權利和自由等。他認為隨意亂用「法治」一詞，往往會不慎為一些「以法管治」或「人治」的政權錯誤鍍金，給他們加上名不符實的道德冠冕。

馬道立雖未批判佔領行動，但是對法庭頒布的禁制令受到挑戰，顯露不滿。他說「由法院頒下的判決和命令，理應獲得尊重和遵行」。馬道立的說法，即使較溫婉，仍然可收擲地有聲之效。

石永泰的身分較少包袱，對佔領行動的批評顯得劍及履及。他對一些人在佔領行動的言行，超出了可接受的限制，認為「遺憾地，很多具影響力的名人卻試圖扭曲甚至否定這些限制」。他特別指出，有人聲稱民事法庭頒布的禁制令，不服從也不算損害法治；辯稱法治概念只用於約束當權者，公民做任何事都不可能對法治有負面影響，云云。石永泰的這些描述，已屬公論。

涉及佔領行動的法律界人士，因為有政治考量，扭曲法治的真義。這是今次佔領行動的敗筆之一。

■Glossary

adherence﹕the act of behaving according to a particular rule or belief, or supporting a particular idea, even in difficult situations

resounding﹕leaving no doubt; very definite